Cognitive Science faculty (bold) and Oxy student (*) publications (2015-present)
Levitan, C., Winfield,E.*, Sherman, A. (2019). Grumpy toddlers and dead pheasants: Visual art preferences are predicted by preferences for the depicted objects. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, & the Arts. Journal Impact: 1.86.
Jertberg, R.*, Levitan, C., Sherman, A. (2018). Multisensory processing of facial expressions in binocular rivalry. Emotion. Journal Impact: 3.039.
Stiles, N. R., Li, M.,ÌýLevitan, C. A., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2018). What you saw is what you will hear: Two new illusions with audiovisual postdictive effects.ÌýPloS one,Ìý13(10), e0204217.
Traiger, Saul.ÌýÌý"Hume on the Methods and Limits of the Science of Human Nature". InÌýHume’s Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Psychology .ÌýPhillip Reed and Rico Vitz, eds.1st Ed.ÌýRoutledge, 2018.
Shtulman, A.Ìý(2017).ÌýScienceblind: Why our intuitive theories of the world are so often wrong. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Van Doorn, G., Woods, A.,ÌýLevitan, C. A., Wan, X., Velasco, C., Bernal-Torres, C., & Spence, C. (2017). Does the shape of a cup influence coffee taste expectations? A cross-cultural, online study.ÌýFood Quality and Preference, 56, 201-211.
Hartcher-O’Brien, J.,ÌýBrighouse, C., &ÌýLevitan, C. A.Ìý(2016). A single mechanism account of duration and rate processing via the pacemaker–accumulator and beat frequency models.ÌýCurrent Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 8,Ìý268-275.
Li, J., &ÌýKohanyi, E.*Ìý(2016). Towards modeling false memory with computational knowledge bases.ÌýProceedings of the 14th International Conference on Cognitive ModelingÌý(ICCM). State College, PA.
Li, J., Jones, S., Mohan, S., & Derbinsky, N. (2016). Architectural mechanisms for mitigating uncertainty during long-term declarative knowledge access.ÌýProceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive SystemsÌý(ACS). Evanston, IL.
Shtulman, A., &ÌýHarrington, K.*Ìý(2016). Tensions between science and intuition across the lifespan.ÌýTopics in Cognitive Science, 8, 118-137.
Shtulman, A., & Lindeman, M. (2016). Attributes of God: Conceptual foundations of a foundational belief.ÌýCognitive Science, 40, 635-670.
Shtulman, A.,ÌýNeal, C.*, &ÌýLindquist, G.*Ìý(2016). Children’s ability to learn evolutionary explanations for biological adaptation.ÌýEarly Education and Development, 27, 1222-1236.
Levitan, C. A.,ÌýBan, Y. H.*, Stiles, N. R., & Shimojo, S. (2015). Rate perception adapts across the senses: evidence for a unified timing mechanism.ÌýNature: Scientific Reports, 5, 8857-8857.
Li, J., & Laird, J. E. (2015). Spontaneous retrieval for prospective memory: Effects of encoding specificity and retention interval.ÌýProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Cognitive ModelingÌý(ICCM), 142-147. Groningen, The Netherlands.
Schloss, K. B.,ÌýGoldberger, C. S.*, Palmer, S. E., &ÌýLevitan, C. A.Ìý(2015). What’s that smell? An ecological approach to understanding preferences for familiar odors.ÌýPerception, 44, 23-38.
Sherman, A., Grabowecky, M., & Suzuki, S. (2015). In the working memory of the beholder: Art appreciation is enhanced when visual complexity is compatible with working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:ÌýHuman Perception and Performance, 41, 898-903.
Shtulman, A.Ìý(2015). How lay cognition constrains scientific cognition.ÌýPhilosophy Compass, 10/11, 785-798.
Shtulman, A.Ìý(2015). What is more informative in the history of science, the signal or the noise?.ÌýCognitive Science, 39, 842-845.
Shtulman, A., &ÌýYoo, R. I.*Ìý(2015). Children's understanding of physical possibility constrains their belief in Santa Claus.ÌýCognitive Development, 34, 51-62.
Woods, A. T., Velasco, C.,ÌýLevitan, C. A., Wan, X., & Spence, C. (2015). Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review.ÌýPeerJ, 3, e1058.